31 May 2019
Supreme Court of Appeal
Citation: Rhino Oil and Gas Exploration SA (Pty) Ltd v Normandien Farms (Pty) Ltd & another (100/2018)  ZASCA 88 (31 May 2019)
Date: 31 May 2019
Judge: Plasket JA (Ponnan, Mbha, Mathopo and Van der Merwe JJA concurring)
This matter concerned the validity of the acceptance of an exploration right application by the Petroleum Association of South Africa (PASA) in terms of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (MPRDA). The Supreme Court of Appeal overturned the judgment of the High Court (see below) that the decision of PASA to accept the application was unlawful since material procedures were not followed. It held that Normandien Farms (Pty) Ltd could not ask for the acceptance of the exploration right application to be set aside on review since it was not prejudiced thereby.
High Court of the Republic of South Africa, Western Cape Division, Cape Town
Case number: 24295/2016
Date: 3 May 2017
Judge: Dlodlo J
In this matter, Normandien Farms (Pty) Ltd challenged the decisions of the South African Agency for the Promotion of Petroleum and Exploration SOC Ltd (PASA) to accept the exploration right application and scoping report submitted to it by Rhino Oil and Gas (Pty) Ltd in respect of properties in the magisterial districts of Newcastle and Dannhauser in KwaZulu-Natal. The found found that PASA did not comply with the peremptory obligations of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002, the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Regulations, 2004 and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014 in the application and acceptance process. The decisions of PASA to accept an application for an exploration right and Rhino’s scoping report were therefore found to be unlawful and set aside on review.
The court also handed down an interdict prohibiting Rhino from submitting an environmental impact assessment report to PASA.